If Goulard rhymes with pluralist, one can not say it is because the tangent maximum permitted electoral mandates. But tomorrow?
Stand for cantonal elections, it raises is the trade-off among its current mandates. Questioned by the press, he told by his son (that become chief of staff for such was the will of dad): "Our concern is not that one, but to win, and it will be difficult." The son is a good school in terms of respect for the voter Vannes. The
Vannetais still have a right to know if their deputy mayor wins the cantonal, or the money he will give up.
Combinatorics authorized mandates is complex but we can retain at least two hypotheses:
- but he remains mayor so he can no longer be a member. As in the year preceding the elections, there can be a partial legislative, the post of MP valves of the National Assembly is vacant,
- he remains a member but then he can longer be mayor or alderman and consequently President chipboard.
It's like throwing François Goulard to cart the ballots of voters who had given him their vote in both occasions.
Afflicting number of cynicism and desertion!
Vannes, you have the right to know and it is the duty of the Republican François Goulard to say before the election of the cantonal what the consequences of his possible victory.
0 comments:
Post a Comment