This is not strictly a film in this commentary, but the revolt which spread this week in all media. And including the creation of a museum Immigration has been closed. The media are powerful in stupidity, they can also be in intelligence, rebellion. They form an opinion. They also shape our identity '.
The first time the word identity has resonated in my mind is in the use of the notion that people of Elie Faure. He used to look at what was the artistic spirit of the people. I recognized that we are caught in a powerful cultural ferment.
The media creates visual images and sound. They transform words into images. While the words give the appearance of being without imaginary instead they show the content. They also show the institution (this is the case to say), they return them. This deconstruction is not a matter for specialists alone, but becomes everybody's business. Here are some: DNA, GENETICS IMMIGRATION DEPARTMENT, CONTROL, FAKE UNEMPLOYED, a few words we have all the dangers and challenges that we address our world. And with them the anger that is brewing.
What we mean by "politics? Nobody can have ownership of the answer to this question. That's why we put it in a debate.
already this poses a problem conditions. Indeed one who asks the question, is also simultaneously a debate. It provides the framework, terms.
Yet it must be, and that's what the politicians that we ask ourselves if we want to act. That is a paradox: democracy is the power of all, but this power is only possible through the power of each. By way of influencing the thing put together.
The question addressed simultaneously to all, it is also the property of all. Only to the extent that, paradoxically, we are intimately affected by it. We make a personal matter. Who engages our destiny, our horizon, the way we position ourselves and act at once personal and collective.
This refers to process a question for us personally and collectively, of our participation in society. When a politician, regardless of the responsibilities vested in him, established a department called "French identity and immigration", in his statement he answered the question instead of others. It's not like they say in the spirit of gathering, treatment equal to all life. Regardless of responsibility, this man, Nicolas Sarkozy, is more responsible than we are what we are and how we must live with others. This man robs us of the issue.
In this way, "the" policy could it be understood as a way to close to close the question, "the" policy? I have another point of view. Raise the question of politics is both the question of reports of civil society in its institutions.
This is a thought and action. In active thinking and versus, a thoughtful action.
Alain Arnaud
0 comments:
Post a Comment